TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a Testing Method for the Accuracy and Precision of GNSS and LiDAR Technology
AU - Romero, Kerin F.
AU - Castillo, Yorbi
AU - Quesada, Marcelo
AU - Zumbado, Yorjani
AU - Jiménez, Juan Carlos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/9/22
Y1 - 2025/9/22
N2 - This study evaluates the positional accuracy of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) and Unmanned Aerial vehicle (UAV)-based LiDAR systems in terrain modeling, using a total station as a reference. The research was conducted over 17 Ground Control Points (GCPs), with measurements obtained using a CHCNAV i50 GNSS receiver and a DJI Zenmuse L1 Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensor mounted on a UAV. Accuracy was assessed for horizontal (X, Y) and vertical (Z) components by comparing the results against total station data. Errors were quantified using statistical metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and RMS at 1σ. GNSS exhibited superior horizontal accuracy with an RMS 1σ of 1.1 cm, while LiDAR achieved 1.7 cm. In contrast, GNSS outperformed LiDAR in vertical precision, achieving a 1σ RMS of 6.4 cm compared to 6.6 cm for LiDAR. These findings align with manufacturer specifications and international standards such as those of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS). The results highlight that GNSS is preferable for applications requiring high horizontal precision, while LiDAR is better suited for vertical modeling and terrain analysis. The combination of both systems may offer enhanced results for comprehensive geospatial surveys. Overall, both technologies demonstrated sub-decimetric accuracy suitable for precision agriculture, civil engineering, and environmental monitoring.
AB - This study evaluates the positional accuracy of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) and Unmanned Aerial vehicle (UAV)-based LiDAR systems in terrain modeling, using a total station as a reference. The research was conducted over 17 Ground Control Points (GCPs), with measurements obtained using a CHCNAV i50 GNSS receiver and a DJI Zenmuse L1 Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensor mounted on a UAV. Accuracy was assessed for horizontal (X, Y) and vertical (Z) components by comparing the results against total station data. Errors were quantified using statistical metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and RMS at 1σ. GNSS exhibited superior horizontal accuracy with an RMS 1σ of 1.1 cm, while LiDAR achieved 1.7 cm. In contrast, GNSS outperformed LiDAR in vertical precision, achieving a 1σ RMS of 6.4 cm compared to 6.6 cm for LiDAR. These findings align with manufacturer specifications and international standards such as those of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS). The results highlight that GNSS is preferable for applications requiring high horizontal precision, while LiDAR is better suited for vertical modeling and terrain analysis. The combination of both systems may offer enhanced results for comprehensive geospatial surveys. Overall, both technologies demonstrated sub-decimetric accuracy suitable for precision agriculture, civil engineering, and environmental monitoring.
KW - GNSS
KW - LiDAR
KW - geospatial surveying
KW - positional accuracy
KW - terrain modeling
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105017080746
UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7090310
U2 - 10.3390/agriengineering7090310
DO - 10.3390/agriengineering7090310
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:105017080746
SN - 2624-7402
VL - 7
JO - AgriEngineering
JF - AgriEngineering
IS - 9
M1 - 310
ER -