Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Kinematic sub-populations in bull spermatozoa: A comparison of classical and bayesian approaches

  • Luis Víquez
  • , Vinicio Barquero
  • , Carles Soler
  • , Eduardo R.S. Roldan
  • , Anthony Valverde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

The ejaculate is heterogenous and sperm sub-populations with different kinematic patterns can be identified in various species. Nevertheless, although these sub-populations are statistically well defined, the statistical differences are not always relevant. The aim of the present study was to characterize kinematic sub-populations in sperm from two bovine species, and diluted with different commercial extenders, and to determine the statistical relevance of sub-populations through Bayesian analysis. Semen from 10 bulls was evaluated after thawing. An ISAS®v1 computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA)-Mot system was employed with an image acquisition rate of 50 Hz and ISAS®D4C20 counting chambers. Sub-populations of motile spermatozoa were characterized using multivariate procedures such as principal components (PCs) analysis and clustering methods (k-means model). Four different sperm sub-populations were identified from three PCs that involved progressiveness, velocity, and cell undulatory movement. The proportions of the different sperm sub-populations varied with the extender used and in the two species. Despite a statistical difference (p < 0.05) between extenders, the Bayesian analysis confirmed that only one of them (Triladyl®) presented relevant differences in kinematic patterns when compared with Tris-EY and OptiXcell®. Extenders differed in the proportion of sperm cells in each of the kinematic sub-populations. Similar patterns were identified in Bos taurus and Bos indicus. Bayesian results indicate that sub-populations SP1, SP2, and SP3 were different for PC criteria and these differences were relevant. For velocity, linearity, and progressiveness, the SP4 did not show a relevant difference regarding the other sperm sub-populations. The classical approach of clustering or sperm subpopulation thus may not have a direct biological meaning. Therefore, the biological relevance of sperm sub-populations needs to be reevaluated.

Original languageEnglish
Article number138
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalBiology
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2020

Keywords

  • Bull
  • CASA
  • Cluster
  • Kinematics
  • Motility
  • Spermatozoa

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Kinematic sub-populations in bull spermatozoa: A comparison of classical and bayesian approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this