Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Abundance drives broad patterns of generalisation in plant–hummingbird pollination networks

  • Benno I. Simmons
  • , Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni
  • , Pietro K. Maruyama
  • , Peter A. Cotton
  • , Oscar H. Marín-Gómez
  • , Carlos Lara
  • , Liliana Rosero-Lasprilla
  • , María A. Maglianesi
  • , Raul Ortiz-Pulido
  • , Márcia A. Rocca
  • , Licléia C. Rodrigues
  • , Boris A. Tinoco
  • , Marcelo F. Vasconcelos
  • , Marlies Sazima
  • , Ana M. Martín González
  • , Jesper Sonne
  • , Carsten Rahbek
  • , Lynn V. Dicks
  • , Bo Dalsgaard
  • , William J. Sutherland
  • University of Cambridge
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas
  • University of Plymouth
  • Instituto de Ecologia, A.C.
  • Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala
  • Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
  • Universidad Estatal a Distancia
  • Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F)
  • Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Hidalgo
  • Universidade Federal de Sergipe
  • Universidad del Azuay
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
  • University of Copenhagen
  • University of East Anglia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

Abundant pollinators are often more generalised than rare pollinators. This could be because abundant species have more chance encounters with potential interaction partners. On the other hand, generalised species could have a competitive advantage over specialists, leading to higher abundance. Determining the direction of the abundance–generalisation relationship is therefore a ‘chicken-and-egg’ dilemma. Here we determine the direction of the relationship between abundance and generalisation in plant–hummingbird pollination networks across the Americas. We find evidence that hummingbird pollinators are generalised because they are abundant, and little evidence that hummingbirds are abundant because they are generalised. Additionally, most patterns of species-level abundance and generalisation were well explained by a null model that assumed interaction neutrality (interaction probabilities defined by species relative abundances). These results suggest that neutral processes play a key role in driving broad patterns of generalisation in animal pollinators across large spatial scales.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1287-1295
Number of pages9
JournalOikos
Volume128
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • mutualism
  • mutualistic networks
  • plant–animal interactions
  • specialisation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Abundance drives broad patterns of generalisation in plant–hummingbird pollination networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this